HOMEHOME

[article index]

release source topdate
Are You Normal nme 7 november 1992

STRANGE NEDFELLOWS

NED'S ATOMIC DUSTBIN
Are You Normal? (Furtive/Sony/All formats)
GRUNGETROOPERS IN smelly boots and dodgy shorts, Neds ground their tyres into the tarmac for 18 months to wind up where? To be a Carter for the whole of Britain instead of just London? To become road junkies, going cold turkey and disoriented when they get home? To crack up? To discover whether this band with a Spike Milligan nonsense name could be anything other than an endless ritual of cold floors, motorways, stages and beers? In short, why are Neds?
Their first LP 'God Fodder' passed in a debut haze. It confirmed their existence for the five people under 20 who hadn't seen them. Then came 'Happy', a single that confirmed there really was something beyond the telly-murders and fringes, a record unlike any other. I remember Martin Gilks from the Stuffies playing it to me before it came out, and I couldn't find anything to say about it.
It was perfect, but weird: it hurt, revealing the fragile human beings behind the Neds' mob-handed phenomenon. Spend all that time in a shiteheap van keeping strange hours and something weird is going to happen to you. 'Are You Normal?', despite a title that might easily be taken for a joke, shows that 'Happy' was no fluke. Ned's are f—ed-up, and perfectly capable of articulating it.
Side One of 'Are You Normal?' is virtually all dissection of personal problems. If that sounds dull, you're forgetting the Neds' fury, a soundstorm of demonic proportions. They've learnt to manage this noise in the studio so that it's no longer an unwieldy scattershot taking out friend and foe alike. They're now hitting their targets every time, producing stuff of comparative subtlety like 'Who Goes First' with its mandolin moments, and 'Legoland', a perfect stadium rock song without the pomp and anonymity.
'Swallowing Air' opens with bubbles and finishes with crosstalk and a thin, gentle drumbeat, which book-end a song about hidden demons and, probably, infidelities. 'Tantrum', an appeal for reason and consistency, neatly closes the wringing first half. After six songs, you're destroyed.
Side Two is brighter and puts you back together. It's altogether more straightforward, from the single 'Not Sleeping Around' ('Legoland' might have been a better 45), through the suspiciously bright 'You Don't Want To Do That' (it darkens briefly after each verse), the brief guitar reflection of 'Fracture', to 'Intact', a final, burning sign that really you can get through being messed up, even if it scars you.
Their songs still have little traditional songwriter's logic, preferring instead to return to the same point before or after you expect them to. Maybe they can't count or can't be bothered. The titles still relate more to a word in a verse than what might approximately be called a chorus. There's still much talk of what is apparently domestic or suicidal violence, and only 'Suave And Suffocated', which rails against being inspected and analysed (sorry chaps), really indicates their star status. They're still a mess, abnormal even by rock standards.
By the sound of 'Tantrum' and 'Intact', these people have been through some murderous, futile relationships - probably an occupational hazard - but this isn't Phil Collins' divorce album. This is Neds venting their frustrations as ever, but finding order through catharsis. That's why Neds exist: order through disorder, a chaotic way of feeling better. And somehow you catch that feeling.
At the end, when you've finished walking through their aural syrup, you feel relieved because of the intensity. But the relief only lasts a few moments: you've got to put it on again .. .and again. If you answer "No" to the title, don't worry. So do Neds. (9)
Ian McCann